Skip to main content

Back to the Future with Polaroid Z340


I first heard of the Polaroid Z340 from a friend, who posted about it on her Twitter feed. When I followed the link and saw its photo, I was struck with a wave of nostalgia. It reminded me very much of the Polaroid camera I had in college, which I used to take reference photos for art classes. This was the early 90s, and therefore, way pre-digital. Which begs the question: does a camera like this have a place anymore in our almost entirely digital photography world? Judging from my artsy-craftsy's friend's enthusiasm, I'd say yes, albeit a very small place.

While a vast majority of people prefer to share their photos digitally--for reasons of speed and economy--there are definitely times when you'd like to be able to print photos on the fly. Say, at a kids' birthday party, a wedding reception, and other such occasions to produce instant keepsakes. I think that's why photo booths have become such popular fixtures at special events these days. If you consider that a photo booth rental costs about $300 for 4 hours, spending that much for a camera that can provide similar capabilities seems like it could be a worthwhile investment. And the best part is that you get to keep a digital original of the photo that you can use to reproduce other prints in the future.

As the case was with the old Polaroid cameras, instant gratification doesn't come cheap: 30 sheets of the printing paper will set you back $20, and there are other issues with the camera, which you can find out about in an an excellent clear-eyed review of the product from arstechnica.com. After having read the review I determined that it wasn't a product I'd want to invest $300 in, but I can certainly see its appeal for others. I think Polaroid was smart to take advantage of their heritage to stake a place in this niche market, and I hope they continue to improve on it to convert more users and ensure the longevity of that market. As someone who was once a devotรฉe of Polaroid products, I'd sure hate to see them go the way of Kodak.

- Stephanie Han

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Packaging: 10 Steps to a Better Process

1. Prioritize. Prioritize. Prioritize. When three people are talking to you, you can’t hear them all. The same is true for design. Visual priority must be established from the very beginning of the design process. If every item is given primary importance, nothing becomes important. The visual priorities are what drive how all creative will be judged. The design firm should include as part of their creative brief, a hierarchy of 5 communication points for the front of the package. This includes 1) brand 2) product name 3) why-to-buy statement 4) feature points 5) product image. 2. Come together. Everyone has an opinion, so clear project objectives are vital to any job. Consensus regarding the creative brief must be obtained from the people expected to judge the package design from within your corporation. Without this consensus, the design process will fall apart. Without clearly stated, agreed-upon objectives, you are not able to provide constructive feedback. As soon as you start t

New and Not Necessarily Improved

A story in the March 3, 2009 issue of the LA Times regarding the unfavorably received new Pepsi brand redesign reminded me of another recent unsuccessful redesign—the one for Tropicana orange juice. A few months ago, I was in a Target store buying some orange juice. I usually get the Tropicana brand, and was disappointed when I didn't see any in the cases. I just saw a bunch of unfamiliar cartons that I immediately wrote off as "not Tropicana" and kept looking around. It was only during a second pass that I realized that these new cartons were indeed Tropicana. Wow, I thought, that's a pretty radical new look. Gone were any vestiges of familiarity--the funky old-style logo, and especially the orange with the straw stuck in it. The new carton is dominated by a large shot of a tasteful-looking (not necessarily tasty-looking) glass of orange juice, with the word "Tropicana" in an unfamiliar sans serif font and green color turned 90ยบ clockwise along the side. T

Let Your Packaging Sell Your Product, Not a Funny Name!

So I ran across this product while I was traveling in NY and needed some earplugs.  I can't sleep without them. Earplugs are notoriously hard to find on shelf so I had to scan many products. I came across this product and got quite a chuckle. I don't think I need to explain why (To be fair, it was awhile ago, and the package design could have changed since then.): Zim's Crack Creme---we can assume that Zim is the pharmacist who created this all-natural herbal wonder cream (creme) for your crack. Or is that really what this means. Surly it couldn't. We design packaging and I couldn't help but analyze this package as I would for a client. The first thing we help our clients do is to prioritize the elements on the front of the package. What is the most important thing to communicate? The name? The brand? The why-to-buy? The features? Obviously, Zim felt the name of the product was most important. But if the name of the product doesn't really convey what it doe