Skip to main content

Avoid Creating these 5 Potholes on the Path-to-Purchase

The reason the path-to-purchase has potholes can sometimes be blamed on the manufacturer. Each group responsible for bringing the product to market often function in silos with no common goal. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the consumer high-tech industry. The result is an inconsistent message that confuses the customer throughout the buying process. Identified below are the four steps outlining the physical and digital touchpoints a customer may encounter along the way.

All of these touchpoints should have a consistent message and branding. Unfortunately, this isn't always the case. I have experienced each of these during my time working on the client side and agency side of retail marketing.

POTHOLE #1 Weak Branding: Product Design and Engineering
While a product is being engineered, there is also an industrial designer involved who designs the format and footprint that determines how a consumer will interact with the product. I have worked on launching products where the industrial designer has designed the logo for the product and has determined the font and placement. Industrial Designers are creative but they shouldn't be in charge of the branding of the product. Oftentimes marketers get involved too late and they need to work with a name or font that isn't appropriate for the product. This starts the marketing of the product from a weak brand position.

POTHOLE #2 Cluttered Packaging: Product Management and Product Marketing
These two departments have a worms eye view of the product. They have an in depth knowledge of the market, the competition and the positioning they think is appropriate for the product. They also use a lot of words and they often think every feature needs to be communicated on marketing materials. One shared responsibility they have is product packaging and they often don't have the expertise to guide a team to design the package.  When providing the information to the marketing team or directly to the designer, they provide too much detail and have a difficult time targeting the message. The result can be a box that is too cluttered, has no hierarchy of messaging and contains a wordy positioning statement and supporting bullet points. Packaging that doesn't communicate the benefit of the product to the customer may mean they will choose a competitor's product which communicates to them more effectively.

POTHOLE #3 Bad Out-of-Box Experience: Operations and Purchasing
These groups are tasked with containing costs of the product packaging. Sacrifices need to be made to meet the per unit cost of the packaging and its contents. A customer engages with the brand through the packaging so if this experience is negative, it is a poor reflection on the brand. If the quality of the packaging doesn't match the perceived value of the product, this can effect the perception of the brand. The out-of-box experience includes the set up materials which are sometimes directed by operations. If the materials are inconsistent and hard to follow this experience may cause a customer to provide a negative review on the product. In addition, they won't recommend the product or become a brand advocate.

POTHOLE # 4 Inconsistent Messaging: Marketing
Often times, In consumer high-tech manufacturing companies, the packaging artwork has already been handed off to be printed well before the marketing teams become fully engaged. The messaging on the package and it's in-store brand perception has already been created so marketing teams must work with what has already been developed OR they may ignore all of the previous work and start from scratch. This includes advertising, PR, merchandising and channel marketing. If all of marketing isn't under the guidance of one strong VP or Director, the messaging can be inconsistent across all different outlets. This continues the customer's confusion along the path to purchase and weakens the message of the brand.

POTHOLE #5 Poor online Experience: IT Department
Customers often start their product research online so this is their first exposure to the brand. A company's website is often managed by the "internet group" or "IT department". They are responsible for updating content and managing the maintenance. Sometimes marketing has a key role in providing content and sometimes it doesn't. If the company's website has a rigid content management system, adding content is difficult and has little flexibility. Even if there is great content available, the wait time to get it uploaded can be long and won't benefit the launch of a new product. This first impression sets the stage for the rest of the communication of the product and if it doesn't have a consistent brand message your customer could abandon the purchase online or in store.

Below are more articles about the path to purchase:
7 Ways to Win Customers on their Path to Purchase
Off the Beaten Path to Purchase
New Consumer Path to Purchase


Patty Jensen is Vice President of Account Services at JDA Inc, a graphic design firm that specializes in supporting companies' branding and retail efforts with a Unified Marketing approach. To learn more, click here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Packaging: 10 Steps to a Better Process

1. Prioritize. Prioritize. Prioritize. When three people are talking to you, you can’t hear them all. The same is true for design. Visual priority must be established from the very beginning of the design process. If every item is given primary importance, nothing becomes important. The visual priorities are what drive how all creative will be judged. The design firm should include as part of their creative brief, a hierarchy of 5 communication points for the front of the package. This includes 1) brand 2) product name 3) why-to-buy statement 4) feature points 5) product image. 2. Come together. Everyone has an opinion, so clear project objectives are vital to any job. Consensus regarding the creative brief must be obtained from the people expected to judge the package design from within your corporation. Without this consensus, the design process will fall apart. Without clearly stated, agreed-upon objectives, you are not able to provide constructive feedback. As soon as you start t

New and Not Necessarily Improved

A story in the March 3, 2009 issue of the LA Times regarding the unfavorably received new Pepsi brand redesign reminded me of another recent unsuccessful redesign—the one for Tropicana orange juice. A few months ago, I was in a Target store buying some orange juice. I usually get the Tropicana brand, and was disappointed when I didn't see any in the cases. I just saw a bunch of unfamiliar cartons that I immediately wrote off as "not Tropicana" and kept looking around. It was only during a second pass that I realized that these new cartons were indeed Tropicana. Wow, I thought, that's a pretty radical new look. Gone were any vestiges of familiarity--the funky old-style logo, and especially the orange with the straw stuck in it. The new carton is dominated by a large shot of a tasteful-looking (not necessarily tasty-looking) glass of orange juice, with the word "Tropicana" in an unfamiliar sans serif font and green color turned 90ยบ clockwise along the side. T

Let Your Packaging Sell Your Product, Not a Funny Name!

So I ran across this product while I was traveling in NY and needed some earplugs.  I can't sleep without them. Earplugs are notoriously hard to find on shelf so I had to scan many products. I came across this product and got quite a chuckle. I don't think I need to explain why (To be fair, it was awhile ago, and the package design could have changed since then.): Zim's Crack Creme---we can assume that Zim is the pharmacist who created this all-natural herbal wonder cream (creme) for your crack. Or is that really what this means. Surly it couldn't. We design packaging and I couldn't help but analyze this package as I would for a client. The first thing we help our clients do is to prioritize the elements on the front of the package. What is the most important thing to communicate? The name? The brand? The why-to-buy? The features? Obviously, Zim felt the name of the product was most important. But if the name of the product doesn't really convey what it doe