Skip to main content

4 Ways to Piss Off a Client and Maybe Lose Them (Part 2)




This is the flip side to our previous blog about how a client can shut down the creative process. Agencies can also be part of creating a bad relationship with their client and the creative output will surely suffer. The worse case scenario is “you’re fired!” Here are some sure ways to ruin a great relationship:

1)    Don’t Listen.
Often times a project will start out and the client has their own vision for what they want to see (or their boss does). Don’t put on your prima donna hat and ignore their request. Look deeper into the request and ask why they want to take this approach and explore it in one of your directions. When presenting this, reiterate how you incorporated their original input. Resist the urge to try and make this direction look the worse, or they will surely choose it.
Address your client’s input in your designs.

2)    Ignore Deadlines.
Let’s face it, we are in a deadline driven profession and we pride ourselves on making deadlines. In fact, one of our clients pointed out to me once that she was amazed at how well our agency met deadlines. The only time we have ever bought extra time is when preparing creative. (Good ideas don’t often come at the exact time you expect.) That said, ignoring a deadline can be detrimental to your relationship with your client. Even if they aren’t on top of the deadline, they trust that you will be. You are there to make them look good.
Be a person of your word.

3)    Charge More Money than Estimated.
Money is always a touchy subject with clients and it is hard to discuss budgets with creative but it must be done. At the beginning of a job, always outline the expectations and scope of the project. If the scope changes at any point during the project, ( ie: a 10 page web site becomes an 100 page web site) have a frank discussion on how this effects the budget. Don’t wait until the end and then drop the bomb. More than likely, they know they are changing scope, but they don’t know how it will effect their budget unless you tell them up front.
Don’t wait to talk about the hard stuff.

4)    Complain.
There may be one person on the client’s team that isn’t easy to work with. My advice is to work on your relationship with that person before you ever go over their head. Once, and I’m speaking from experience, we had our client open the conversation about a difficult employee and asked our opinion. Rather than be tactful, we were painfully honest. That wasn’t the bad part though. We didn’t shut up. We reiterated the issues far longer than the client wanted to discuss them. It made us look really bad and guess what? We lost the client. I can’t blame them and we learned a valuable lesson.
Even if asked your opinion—be tactful.

We are in this business to make our clients look good to their customers and their superiors. Also, without them, we wouldn’t have a business. We are lucky, if a relationship is really bad we can walk away—but most clients are reasonable and we value their business.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Packaging: 10 Steps to a Better Process

1. Prioritize. Prioritize. Prioritize. When three people are talking to you, you can’t hear them all. The same is true for design. Visual priority must be established from the very beginning of the design process. If every item is given primary importance, nothing becomes important. The visual priorities are what drive how all creative will be judged. The design firm should include as part of their creative brief, a hierarchy of 5 communication points for the front of the package. This includes 1) brand 2) product name 3) why-to-buy statement 4) feature points 5) product image. 2. Come together. Everyone has an opinion, so clear project objectives are vital to any job. Consensus regarding the creative brief must be obtained from the people expected to judge the package design from within your corporation. Without this consensus, the design process will fall apart. Without clearly stated, agreed-upon objectives, you are not able to provide constructive feedback. As soon as you start t

New and Not Necessarily Improved

A story in the March 3, 2009 issue of the LA Times regarding the unfavorably received new Pepsi brand redesign reminded me of another recent unsuccessful redesign—the one for Tropicana orange juice. A few months ago, I was in a Target store buying some orange juice. I usually get the Tropicana brand, and was disappointed when I didn't see any in the cases. I just saw a bunch of unfamiliar cartons that I immediately wrote off as "not Tropicana" and kept looking around. It was only during a second pass that I realized that these new cartons were indeed Tropicana. Wow, I thought, that's a pretty radical new look. Gone were any vestiges of familiarity--the funky old-style logo, and especially the orange with the straw stuck in it. The new carton is dominated by a large shot of a tasteful-looking (not necessarily tasty-looking) glass of orange juice, with the word "Tropicana" in an unfamiliar sans serif font and green color turned 90ยบ clockwise along the side. T

Let Your Packaging Sell Your Product, Not a Funny Name!

So I ran across this product while I was traveling in NY and needed some earplugs.  I can't sleep without them. Earplugs are notoriously hard to find on shelf so I had to scan many products. I came across this product and got quite a chuckle. I don't think I need to explain why (To be fair, it was awhile ago, and the package design could have changed since then.): Zim's Crack Creme---we can assume that Zim is the pharmacist who created this all-natural herbal wonder cream (creme) for your crack. Or is that really what this means. Surly it couldn't. We design packaging and I couldn't help but analyze this package as I would for a client. The first thing we help our clients do is to prioritize the elements on the front of the package. What is the most important thing to communicate? The name? The brand? The why-to-buy? The features? Obviously, Zim felt the name of the product was most important. But if the name of the product doesn't really convey what it doe